WPF commends CAIDP’s AI and Democratic Values Index

WPF commends the publication of the Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Values Index by the Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP). The Index, which was published 21 February 2022, contains an overview of AI implementation in the country-level context, covering 50 countries, and focusing on how implementations are progressing. WPF’s Executive Director, Pam Dixon, contributed to this years’ Index.

“I am pleased to be a contributor to the CAIDP Index,” said Pam Dixon. “It is extremely important to measure implementations of national AI strategies, to compare ambitious AI strategies ‘on the books’ to implementations as they are ‘on the ground’, in reality, and over time.” This is Dixon’s second round of contributions to the report, the first being for the 2020 report.

Dixon is a part of the OECD AI Group of Experts. She worked on the OECD AI Principles, which were adopted in May 2019, and continues to work with OECD in its AI Observatory.

Related Documents and Information:

OECD AI Principles
CAIDP Index: Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Values Index
Overview of CAIDP Index (Excerpted from the CAIDP Press Release):

The Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP) today released the updated global ranking of countries, based on national AI policies and practices. The report – Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Values Index measured progress toward AI policies that safeguard human rights and the rule of law. The AIDV Index bridges the gap between policies and practices with fact- based evaluations of individual countries, and ratings and rankings to compare countries and to evaluate trends over time.

The ground-breaking analysis of AI in 50 countries was conducted by a global team of AI policy experts. The findings include ambitious plans and wide disparities on metrics such as data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and public participation in policy development. Some countries are making progress. Others have work to do to catch up with democratic norms.

“We have reasons for optimism and reasons for concern,” said CAIDP Chair Merve Hickok. “The AIDV Index found global support for strong frameworks to regulate AI. At the same time, the threats to fundamental rights, enabled by AI techniques, are on the rise.”

The AIDV Index, prepared by CAIDP, is based on global norms found in the OECD/G20 AI Principles, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the new UNESCO Recommendation on AI Ethics. Policies and practices were evaluated for 50 countries. There was also careful analysis of AI related developments in 2021 at international organizations, including the G7 and the G20, the European Union, and the Council of Europe. This was the second edition of the report, and reflected the contributions of more than 100 experts and advocates from almost 40 countries. (See full release here.)

Posted February 21, 2022 in AI, Best Practices

New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...
Report: From the Filing Cabinet to the Cloud: Updating the Privacy Act of 1974

This comprehensive report and proposed bill text is focused on the Privacy Act of 1974, an important and early Federal privacy law that applies to the government sector and some contractors. The Privacy Act was written for the 1970s information era -- an era that was characterized by the use of mainframe computers and filing cabinets. Today's digital information era looks much different than the '70s: smart phones are smarter than the old mainframes, and documents are now routinely digitized and stored and perhaps even analyzed in the cloud, among many other changes. The report focuses on why the Privacy Act needs an update that will bring it into this century, and how that could look and work. This work was written by Robert Gellman, and informed by a two-year multi-stakeholder process.