OECD Digital Economy Ministerial Meeting

The World Privacy Forum with ADC have been designated as the Civil Society Heads of Delegation for the OECD Ministerial. Pam Dixon, Executive Director of WPF and Valeria Milanes, Executive Director of ADC will be the delegates on site in Gran Canaria.

For this event, WPF and ADC have collaborated on a global research project exploring the Twin Transition. At the Ministerial, we will be presenting this original research incorporating views from the global south and north.

Activities: Civil Society at OECD (CSISAC) is presenting a “Day Zero” event for members of civil society. We will be hosting a meeting with the civil society delegation at OECD, a roundtable on AI, a roundtable on the Twin Transition, and we will be participating in a full day’s activities with stakeholders.

During the Ministerial, Pam Dixon will be speaking about digitalization and its impacts in a plenary session, and will be representing civil society as a delegate to the Ministerial meetings.

December 12: Civil Society Delegates Meeting and meeting with Spanish civil society

December 13: Day Zero, Civil Society panels and roundtables

December 14-15: Ministerial

December 16: CDEP meeting for delegates

We will be posting materials related to the Ministerial on WPF. For more information, see the extensive OECD Digital Ministerial Materials, which also include video archives of the two civil society roundtables at the Ministerial.

OECD Digital Economy Ministerial: Main page with agenda, bios, replays

OECD Digital Economy Ministerial Press Release

Posted December 10, 2022 in

New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...
Report: From the Filing Cabinet to the Cloud: Updating the Privacy Act of 1974

This comprehensive report and proposed bill text is focused on the Privacy Act of 1974, an important and early Federal privacy law that applies to the government sector and some contractors. The Privacy Act was written for the 1970s information era -- an era that was characterized by the use of mainframe computers and filing cabinets. Today's digital information era looks much different than the '70s: smart phones are smarter than the old mainframes, and documents are now routinely digitized and stored and perhaps even analyzed in the cloud, among many other changes. The report focuses on why the Privacy Act needs an update that will bring it into this century, and how that could look and work. This work was written by Robert Gellman, and informed by a two-year multi-stakeholder process.