WPF Executive Director to teach AI Policy for Policy Makers in the Developing World

WPF Executive Director Pam Dixon will be the lead teacher for a summer course at Carnegie Mellon University CEE-TP on Artificial Intelligence Governance, Safety, and Risk Assessment for Policy Makers.

“It is a great honor to teach this course, and to share the knowledge I’ve earned from working with AI for many years, and from working in the development context on privacy, data ecosystems governance, research, health data, and identity ecosystems over the years. I’m looking forward to learning from each of the students, and hearing about their context regarding AI policy,” said Dixon.

The course will take place in Bangkok Thailand August 7-10, and will cover AI governance, policy, standards, normative principles, legislation, AI tools, and extensive analysis of these topics in the development context. New regulatory proposals regarding generative forms of AI will be analyzed thoroughly, and students will have opportunities for in-depth discussions throughout.

The course will also include an introduction to machine learning and deep learning, and generally, machine learning thinking.

Posted August 7, 2023 in

New Report: Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools

We are pleased to announce the publication of a new WPF report, “Risky Analysis: Assessing and Improving AI Governance Tools.” This report sets out a definition of AI governance tools, documents why and how these tools are critically important for trustworthy AI, and where these tools are around the world. The report also documents problems in some AI governance tools themselves, and suggests pathways to improve AI governance tools and create an evaluative environment to measure their effectiveness. AI systems should not be deployed without simultaneously evaluating the potential adverse impacts of such systems and mitigating their risks, and most of the world agrees about the need to take precautions against the threats posed. The specific tools and techniques that exist to evaluate and measure AI systems for their inclusiveness, fairness, explainability, privacy, safety and other trustworthiness issues — called in the report collectively AI governance tools – can improve such issues. While some AI governance tools provide reassurance to the public and to regulators, the tools too often lack meaningful oversight and quality assessments. Incomplete or ineffective AI governance tools can create a false sense of confidence, cause unintended problems, and generally undermine the promise of AI systems. The report contains rich background details, use cases, potential solutions to the problems discussed in the report, and a global index of AI Governance Tools.
National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...
Report: From the Filing Cabinet to the Cloud: Updating the Privacy Act of 1974

This comprehensive report and proposed bill text is focused on the Privacy Act of 1974, an important and early Federal privacy law that applies to the government sector and some contractors. The Privacy Act was written for the 1970s information era -- an era that was characterized by the use of mainframe computers and filing cabinets. Today's digital information era looks much different than the '70s: smart phones are smarter than the old mainframes, and documents are now routinely digitized and stored and perhaps even analyzed in the cloud, among many other changes. The report focuses on why the Privacy Act needs an update that will bring it into this century, and how that could look and work. This work was written by Robert Gellman, and informed by a two-year multi-stakeholder process.