Uncategorized

Sep 25 2009

Red Flag Rule: What are the Address Discrepancy Obligations for a Health Care Provider That Uses Credit Reports?

The Address Discrepancy rule requires a user of a consumer report (credit report) to develop and implement reasonable policies and procedures to enable the user to deal with an address discrepancy. These requirements are narrower than the Red Flag rule for creditors. However, applicability of the address discrepancy requirement may affect a broader class of health care provider (and health insurers) than the Red Flag rule.

Sep 25 2009

Red Flag Rule: Conclusion

The Red Flag rule represents an important opportunity for the health care sector to protect consumers and patients from the impacts of medical and other forms of identity theft.

Sep 25 2009

Red Flag Rule: About the Authors

Robert Gellman is a privacy and information policy consultant based in Washington, DC. .

Pam Dixon is the executive director of the World Privacy Forum. .

Sep 25 2009

Red Flag Rule: Appendix 1 – Reproduction of the Red Flag and Address Discrepancy Guidelines and Supplement

Following is a reproduction of the Guidelines and Supplement to the Red Flag and Address Discrepancy Rules. The rulemakings may be found at Federal Trade Commission et al., Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies Under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, 72 Fed. Reg. (Nov. 9, 2007), .

May 08 2009

Consumer Tips: Job Searcher’s Guide to Online Job Sites

This guide to online job sites is a list of the top job searching sites online. This list gives information about the privacy practices at each site. Because resumes contain such detailed personal and professional information, it is well worth caring about how job search sites handle privacy issues. This guide is updated monthly, and we add new information to the guide monthly.

National IDs Around the World — Interactive map

About this Data Visualization: This interactive map displays the presence...
Report: From the Filing Cabinet to the Cloud: Updating the Privacy Act of 1974

This comprehensive report and proposed bill text is focused on the Privacy Act of 1974, an important and early Federal privacy law that applies to the government sector and some contractors. The Privacy Act was written for the 1970s information era -- an era that was characterized by the use of mainframe computers and filing cabinets. Today's digital information era looks much different than the '70s: smart phones are smarter than the old mainframes, and documents are now routinely digitized and stored and perhaps even analyzed in the cloud, among many other changes. The report focuses on why the Privacy Act needs an update that will bring it into this century, and how that could look and work. This work was written by Robert Gellman, and informed by a two-year multi-stakeholder process.
COVID-19 and HIPAA: HHS’s Troubled Approach to Waiving Privacy and Security Rules for the Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic strained the U.S. health ecosystem in numerous ways, including putting pressure on the HIPAA privacy and security rules. The Department of Health and Human Services adjusted the privacy and security rules for the pandemic through the use of statutory and administrative HIPAA waivers. While some of the adjustments are appropriate for the emergency circumstances, there are also some meaningful and potentially unwelcome privacy and security consequences. At an appropriate time, the use of HIPAA waivers as a response to health care emergencies needs a thorough review. This report sets out the facts, identifies the issues, and proposes a roadmap for change.